ArticleHerz2023
Impact of residual coronary artery disease on left ventricular function after percutaneous coronary intervention: a two-dimensional strain echocardiography study.
Article in Herz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the residual SYNTAX score (rSS) and recovery of left ventricular function after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in stable symptomatic patients.
methodOverall, 81 patients (mean age: 62.3 ± 9.1 years, 72.8% male) were included in the study. Echocardiographic parameters were measured before PCI (baseline) and 3 months after PCI (follow-up). The patients were divided into two groups based on rSS: complete revascularized group (CR) with rSS = 0 (n =32; 39.5%) and incomplete revascularized group (iCR) with rSS > 0 (n = 49; 60.5%).
resultsThe median (25th-75th percentile) SYNTAX score (SS) and rSS values were 8 (5-11) and 2 (0-3), respectively. The difference between basal and follow-up global longitudinal strain (GLS) values (∆ GLS) was significantly higher in the CR group (1.25% ± 1.52 vs. 0.11% ± 1.66% p = 0.003). At the follow-up, there was a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (58.41 ± 6.91% vs. 61.74 ± 5.76%, p < 0.001), a significant decrease in Tei index (0.46 ± 0.18 vs. 0.35 ± 0.16%, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in GLS (14.92 ± 2.76% vs. -15.49 ± 2.66%, p = 0.004). In the linear regression analysis, the only variable related to ∆ GLS was rSS (β = -0.113, 95% CI: -0.217--0.010; p = 0.033).
conclusionIncreased residual coronary artery disease burden has a negative impact on recovery of left ventricular function after PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.