ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2023
Automated MR Image Prescription of the Liver Using Deep Learning: Development, Evaluation, and Prospective Implementation.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated Field of View Prescription for Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Learning Based Body Region Segmentations.Investigative radiology · 2025Article
- Automated Placement of Scan and Pre-Scan Volumes for Breast MRI Using a Convolutional Neural Network.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Automatic detection of punctate white matter lesions in infants using deep learning of composite images from two cases.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is an unmet need for fully automated image prescription of the liver to enable efficient, reproducible MRI. PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate artificial intelligence (AI)-based liver image prescription. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: A total of 570 female/469 male patients (age: 56 ± 17 years) with 72%/8%/20% assigned randomly for training/validation/testing; two female/four male healthy volunteers (age: 31 ± 6 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T, 3.0 T; spin echo, gradient echo, bSSFP. ASSESSMENT: A total of 1039 three-plane localizer acquisitions (26,929 slices) from consecutive clinical liver MRI examinations were retrieved retrospectively and annotated by six radiologists. The localizer images and manual annotations were used to train an object-detection convolutional neural network (YOLOv3) to detect multiple object classes (liver, torso, and arms) across localizer image orientations and to output corresponding 2D bounding boxes. Whole-liver image prescription in standard orientations was obtained based on these bounding boxes. 2D detection performance was evaluated on test datasets by calculating intersection over union (IoU) between manual and automated labeling. 3D prescription accuracy was calculated by measuring the boundary mismatch in each dimension and percentage of manual volume covered by AI prescription. The automated prescription was implemented on a 3 T MR system and evaluated prospectively on healthy volunteers. STATISTICAL TESTS: Paired t-tests (threshold = 0.05) were conducted to evaluate significance of performance difference between trained networks.
resultsIn 208 testing datasets, the proposed method with full network had excellent agreement with manual annotations, with median IoU > 0.91 (interquartile range < 0.09) across all seven classes. The automated 3D prescription was accurate, with shifts <2.3 cm in superior/inferior dimension for 3D axial prescription for 99.5% of test datasets, comparable to radiologists' interreader reproducibility. The full network had significantly superior performance than the tiny network for 3D axial prescription in patients. Automated prescription performed well across single-shot fast spin-echo, gradient-echo, and balanced steady-state free-precession sequences in the prospective study. DATA
conclusionAI-based automated liver image prescription demonstrated promising performance across the patients, pathologies, and field strengths studied. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.