Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36583441›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

The 'ForensOMICS' approach for postmortem interval estimation from human bone by integrating metabolomics, lipidomics, and proteomics.

Andrea Bonicelli, Hayley L Mickleburgh, Alberto Chighine, Emanuela Locci, Daniel J Wescott, Noemi Procopio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. "Omics" and Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea BonicelliThe Forensic Science Unit, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9518-584X
Hayley L MickleburghAmsterdam Centre for Ancient Studies and Archaeology (ACASA) - Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9326-8097
Alberto ChighineDepartment of Medical Science and Public Health, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0952-9712
Emanuela LocciDepartment of Medical Science and Public Health, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0237-4228
Daniel J WescottForensic Anthropology Center, Texas State University, San Marcos, United States.
Noemi ProcopioThe Forensic Science Unit, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7461-7586

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S032878/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combined use of multiple omics allows to study complex interrelated biological processes in their entirety. We applied a combination of metabolomics, lipidomics and proteomics to human bones to investigate their combined potential to estimate time elapsed since death (i.e., the postmortem interval [PMI]). This 'ForensOMICS' approach has the potential to improve accuracy and precision of PMI estimation of skeletonized human remains, thereby helping forensic investigators to establish the timeline of events surrounding death. Anterior midshaft tibial bone was collected from four female body donors before their placement at the Forensic Anthropology Research Facility owned by the Forensic Anthropological Center at Texas State (FACTS). Bone samples were again collected at selected PMIs (219-790-834-872days). Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was used to obtain untargeted metabolomic, lipidomic, and proteomic profiles from the pre- and post-placement bone samples. The three omics blocks were investigated independently by univariate and multivariate analyses, followed by Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker discovery using Latent variable approaches for Omics studies (DIABLO), to identify the reduced number of markers describing postmortem changes and discriminating the individuals based on their PMI. The resulting model showed that pre-placement metabolome, lipidome and proteome profiles were clearly distinguishable from post-placement ones. Metabolites in the pre-placement samples suggested an extinction of the energetic metabolism and a switch towards another source of fuelling (e.g., structural proteins). We were able to identify certain biomolecules with an excellent potential for PMI estimation, predominantly the biomolecules from the metabolomics block. Our findings suggest that, by targeting a combination of compounds with different postmortem stability, in the future we could be able to estimate both short PMIs, by using metabolites and lipids, and longer PMIs, by using proteins.

Indexed as

LipidomicsProteomicsFemaleHumansMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsPostmortem Changesbiochemistrychemical biologydecompositionhumanhuman bonelipidomicsmetabolomicsmulti-omicspostmortem intervalproteomics

Identifiers

PMID36583441
PMCPMC9803353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.