Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36583399›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2023

PhiPipe: A multi-modal MRI data processing pipeline with test-retest reliability and predicative validity assessments.

Yang Hu, Qingfeng Li, Kaini Qiao, Xiaochen Zhang, Bing Chen, Zhi Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Intranasal (R)-ketamine modulates depression symptom and neurotransmitters-associated human brain connectivity.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang HuLaboratory of Psychological Health and Imaging, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qingfeng LiLaboratory of Psychological Health and Imaging, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kaini QiaoLaboratory of Psychological Health and Imaging, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaochen ZhangLaboratory of Psychological Health and Imaging, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Bing ChenJing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Zhejiang, China.
Zhi YangLaboratory of Psychological Health and Imaging, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2222-2312

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been one of the primary instruments to measure the properties of the human brain non-invasively in vivo. MRI data generally needs to go through a series of processing steps (i.e., a pipeline) before statistical analysis. Currently, the processing pipelines for multi-modal MRI data are still rare, in contrast to single-modal pipelines. Furthermore, the reliability and validity of the output of the pipelines are critical for the MRI studies. However, the reliability and validity measures are not available or adequate for almost all pipelines. Here, we present PhiPipe, a multi-modal MRI processing pipeline. PhiPipe could process T1-weighted, resting-state BOLD, and diffusion-weighted MRI data and generate commonly used brain features in neuroimaging. We evaluated the test-retest reliability of PhiPipe's brain features by computing intra-class correlations (ICC) in four public datasets with repeated scans. We further evaluated the predictive validity by computing the correlation of brain features with chronological age in three public adult lifespan datasets. The multivariate reliability and predictive validity of the PhiPipe results were also evaluated. The results of PhiPipe were consistent with previous studies, showing comparable or better reliability and validity when compared with two popular single-modality pipelines, namely DPARSF and PANDA. The publicly available PhiPipe provides a simple-to-use solution to multi-modal MRI data processing. The accompanied reliability and validity assessments could help researchers make informed choices in experimental design and statistical analysis. Furthermore, this study provides a framework for evaluating the reliability and validity of image processing pipelines.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of Resultsimage processingmultimodal MRIreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID36583399
PMCPMC9980895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.