Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36583378›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Right inferior frontal gyrus damage is associated with impaired initiation of inhibitory control, but not its implementation.

Yoojeong Choo, Dora Matzke, Mark D Bowren, Daniel Tranel, Jan R Wessel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychotherapy and inhibitory control: Insights from fMRI research.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Common and Unique Neurophysiological Processes That Support the Stopping and Revising of Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Does the stop-signal P3 reflect inhibitory control?Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yoojeong ChooDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1261-9129
Dora MatzkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mark D BowrenDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States.
Daniel TranelDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States.
Jan R WesselDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-6601
University of Iowa · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

The role of cortical and subcortical β-bursts in the cognitive control of human movementR01NS117753 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jan R Wessel · 2020 to 2026
$2.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitory control is one of the most important control functions in the human brain. Much of our understanding of its neural basis comes from seminal work showing that lesions to the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) increase stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), a latent variable that expresses the speed of inhibitory control. However, recent work has identified substantial limitations of the SSRT method. Notably, SSRT is confounded by trigger failures: stop-signal trials in which inhibitory control was never initiated. Such trials inflate SSRT, but are typically indicative of attentional, rather than inhibitory deficits. Here, we used hierarchical Bayesian modeling to identify stop-signal trigger failures in human rIFG lesion patients, non-rIFG lesion patients, and healthy comparisons. Furthermore, we measured scalp-EEG to detect β-bursts, a neurophysiological index of inhibitory control. rIFG lesion patients showed a more than fivefold increase in trigger failure trials and did not exhibit the typical increase of stop-related frontal β-bursts. However, on trials in which such β-bursts did occur, rIFG patients showed the typical subsequent upregulation of β over sensorimotor areas, indicating that their ability to implement inhibitory control, once triggered, remains intact. These findings suggest that the role of rIFG in inhibitory control has to be fundamentally reinterpreted.

Indexed as

Frontal LobeSensorimotor CortexBayes TheoremHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal CortexReaction Timebeta burstsbrain lesionshumaninhibitory controlneuroscienceright inferior frontal gyrusstop-signal tasktrigger failures

Identifiers

PMID36583378
PMCPMC9803357
OpenAlexW4313295371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.