ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2023
Long-term outcomes of fetal posterior fossa abnormalities diagnosed with fetal magnetic resonance imaging
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal Diagnosis and Perinatal Outcomes of Posterior Fossa Anomalies in a Tertiary Referral Center: A Five-Year Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and genetic analysis of different Dandy-Walker malformation.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Utility of Biometric Measurements from Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Improved Antenatal Diagnosis of Dandy-Walker Spectrum Posterior Fossa Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fetal and neonatal outcomes of posterior fossa anomalies: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The diagnosis of posterior fossa abnormalities (PFA) in the intrauterine period and association with pregnancy outcomes are still controversial. PFA is generally referred to maternal-fetal medicine specialists. The primary purpose of PFA diagnosis is to screen for other accompanying abnormalities, provide prognostic information to families, and discuss the termination option. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in patients diagnosed with PFA between January 2013 and September 2020 in a tertiary perinatology clinic. All patients underwent routine second-trimester ultrasound screening and definitive diagnosis was made by fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the presence of a suspected anomaly. Results: There were 164 fetal MRIs for fetal abnormalities during the study period and 22 (13.4%) were diagnosed with a PFA on fetal MRI. Indications for fetal MRI included four (18%) with Mega Cisterna Magna, two (9.1%) with rhomboencephalosynapsis, and thirteen (59.1%) with Vermian Hypoplasia-Dandy-Walker variant. Two patients, with neural tube defects and lumbosacral neural-tube defect are still alive. However, iniencephaly was detected in last patient who died in the postnatal period. Conclusion: Diagnosis of PFA abnormalities is complex, and the prognosis in PFA is often unclear. The prognosis is not affected by maternal and fetal factors and allows the recognition of additional accompanying abnormalities. Fetal MRI is an imaging method that can provide retrospective examination and research, especially in pregnancies with poor prognoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.