Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36583207›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics

Stability estimation for unsupervised clustering: A review.

Tianmou Liu, Han Yu, Rachael Hageman Blair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stability estimation for unsupervised clustering: A review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianmou LiuInstitute for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA.
Han YuRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center Buffalo New York USA.
Rachael Hageman BlairDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8538-2447

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Dean G. Tang · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
Immuno-Oncology Translation Network: Data Management and Resource-Sharing Center at RPCIU24CA232979 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI HUTSON, ALAN DAVID, LIU, SONG · 2018 to 2024
$8.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS U24 CA232979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cluster analysis remains one of the most challenging yet fundamental tasks in unsupervised learning. This is due in part to the fact that there are no labels or gold standards by which performance can be measured. Moreover, the wide range of clustering methods available is governed by different objective functions, different parameters, and dissimilarity measures. The purpose of clustering is versatile, often playing critical roles in the early stages of exploratory data analysis and as an endpoint for knowledge and discovery. Thus, understanding the quality of a clustering is of critical importance. The concept of

Indexed as

clusteringmodel selectionresamplingstabilityunsupervised learningvalidation

Identifiers

PMID36583207
PMCPMC9787023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.