Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36583163›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

A New Classification for Adipose-derived Stromal-cell Systems.

H Eray Copcu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

H Eray CopcuAesthetic, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, G-CAT (Gene, Cell and Tissue) Academy, Tubitak Marmara Technocity, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obtaining regenerative cells from adipose tissue and their clinical use has become one of the most popular subjects of plastic surgery. However, there is no accepted classification in terms of methods. In this study, classification is proposed for the first time as a new idea. Accordingly, stromal cells can be obtained from adipose tissue by two approaches: direct methods for the bonds between parenchymal and stromal cells, and indirect methods, which target parenchymal cells rather than strong bonds, and increase the stromal cell ratio relatively. These methods can also be subclassified as fat (+), fat (-), fat (±) in terms of using the remaining fat in the final product as a graft. Direct methods include adinizing and enzymatic techniques; indirect methods include emulsification and micro-fragmentation/micronization techniques. In the enzymatic method, the fat tissue in the final product is considered dirty because it contains enzymes and must be discarded. That is why it is a fat (-) method. The adinizing method using ultra-sharp blades is fat (+) because the adipose tissue after the procedure can be used. Because the fat tissue is exposed to blunt pressure in emulsification techniques, it cannot be used as a graft. Thus, these are fat (-) methods. In micronization techniques using filter systems, there may still be intact adipocytes; therefore, it should be classified as fat (±). Adinizing provides both the highest efficiency and the full use of the end product. This classification will guide clinicians in terms of choosing the right product.

Identifiers

PMID36583163
PMCPMC9750561
OpenAlexW4313339755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.