ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2022
Catheter-Directed Retrieval of an Infected Fragment in a Vietnam War Veteran.
Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Shrapnel injuries are commonly encountered in war zones. The severity of these injuries depends on the initial damage and both the anatomical and immune response at the time of injury or at more remote times in the case of reactivation. Case Presentation: A veteran sustained a shrapnel injury to his left lower abdomen while serving in the Vietnam War. Nearly 50 years later, the patient presented with a recurrent retroperitoneal abscess associated with a residual fragment. In cooperation between interventional radiology and surgery, traditional endovascular techniques and devices were used to relocate an extravascular, secondarily infected fragment to an area more suitable for a minor surgical approach in the left inguinal region. Subsequent surgical excision and removal required only a superficial incision as opposed to a large retroperitoneal dissection, minimizing recovery time and allowing quick and full healing of the patient. Conclusions: This case demonstrates a multidisciplinary approach to transforming an otherwise large retroperitoneal dissection to a minimally invasive and technically efficient abscess drainage and foreign body retrieval.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.