ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) responsive to mycophenolate mofetil: A case report from Nepal.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: An atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is an extremely rare and life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy. This disorder is caused by dysregulation of the alternative pathway of the complement system in association with genetic abnormalities or the development of autoantibodies. However, 30-50% of patients do not have genetic or acquired mutations in the complement system. Case report: Patient presented with fever and periorbital swelling. She had anemia, thrombocytopenia, and deranged liver function tests. Urinalysis revealed hematuria and proteinuria. Antibody tests and genetic analysis were negative. Renal biopsy revealed findings suggestive of thrombotic microangiopathy with predominantly glomerular involvement. Thus, the diagnosis of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome, immunofluorescence negative, genetic negative, and anti-complement negative was made. Discussion: This article reports a case of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in a child with negative genetic analysis and anti-complement factor H antibody, which was treated successfully on steroid and mycophenolate mofetil. Early diagnosis along with prompt treatment and close monitoring will lead to recovery from atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome. Conclusion: Although HUS is generally associated with genetic abnormalities or a positive antibody test, some patients with HUS may present atypically with negative genetic analysis and antibody tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.