ArticleHeliyon2022
Impact of leachate on quality of ground water around Chunga Landfill, Lusaka, Zambia and possible health risks.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geoenvironmental evaluation of leachate and soil pollution potential of an open dumpsite.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the characteristics and possible impact of leachate on quality of groundwater in the Chunga Landfill area of Lusaka, Zambia. Water and leachate samples were collected within and around the landfill for analysis. The pH, biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrates, sulphates, chlorides for the leachate and groundwater samples were (6.6 ± 0.1 to 8.7 ± 0.0), (1.7 ± 0.3 to 1,569.6 ± 4.9 mg/L), (4.0 ± 0.0 to 10,378.5 ± 59.2 mg/L), (8.0 ± 0.0 to 37.7 ± 0.4 mg/L), (11.7 ± 0.0 to 273.1 ± 1.7 mg/L), (43.0 ± 1.2 to 974.2 ± 0.8 mg/L) respectively. Heavy metal concentration ranges were cadmium (0.004 ± 0.000 to 1.149 ± 0.021 mg/L, chromium (0.007 ± 0.000 to 2.699 ± 0.039 mg/L), copper (0.013 ± 0.002 to 0.246 ± 0.005 mg/L), lead (0.062 ± 0.005 to 2.591 ± 0.065 mg/L) and zinc (0.008 ± 0.001 to 2.032 ± 0.017 mg/L). The pH of the leachate (8.5 ± 0.0 to 8.7 ± 0.0) meant the landfill was in the methane fermentation phase. An indexing approach was used with the leachate pollution index (LPI) of 30.173, heavy metal pollution index (HPI) of 3,938.92. The heavy metal index (HMI) for copper, lead, chromium, cadmium and zinc were found to be 0.92, 1,124.19, 47.20, 994.17 and 1.48 respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that anthropogenic activities contributed to pollution with high loading values. Ash from continuous burning of the waste may provide alkalinity which reduces leachate BOD and COD. Results showed that the landfill has outgrown the designed cells capacity as not all leachate was collected by the under-drainage. Results also showed that lack of adequate landfill cover significantly increases rainfall infiltration thereby increasing volumes of leachate produced with a, hence potential for underground water contamination and a human health and environmental problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.