Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36582721›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Exploitation of indigenous bamboo macrophyte species and bamboo biochar for faecal sludge treatment with constructed wetland technology in the Sudano-Sahelian ecological zone.

Richard Agyemang Osei, Felix Kofi Abagale, Yacouba Konate

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard Agyemang OseiLaboratoire Eaux Hydro-Systèmes et Agriculture, Institut International D'Ingénierie de l'Eau et de l'Environnement (2iE), 01 BP 594 Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso.
Felix Kofi AbagaleWest African Center for Water, Irrigation and Sustainable Agriculture, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.
Yacouba KonateLaboratoire Eaux Hydro-Systèmes et Agriculture, Institut International D'Ingénierie de l'Eau et de l'Environnement (2iE), 01 BP 594 Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of faecal sludge (FS) has been a major challenge in most developing countries of Sub-Saharan Africa due to the difficulties in finding appropriate technology. Previous studies have however highlighted the potentials of the vertical flow constructed wetland for FS treatment, yet efforts in the identification of potential indigenous plant species as macrophyte for the Sudano-Sahelian ecological zone have been unsuccessful due to toxic levels of FS quality. This research studied the macrophyte potentials of indigenous bamboo species and bamboo biochar as a conditioner for FS treatment in a vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW). Typical yard scale experiment consisting of filter media of sand supported at the base with gravels and planted with Bamboo shoots was used. Treatments were Bamboo Constructed Wetland (CW) and Faecal Sludge (FS) load only (CW-FS), Bamboo CW with a mixture of FS and Bamboo biochar (CW-BCH), unplanted drying bed with a mixture of FS and bamboo biochar (UDB-BCH) and an unplanted drying bed with FS (UDB-FS), and in triplicates. Control setup (CTR) consisted of Bamboo CW irrigated with wastewater. Morphological development (plant height, number of plants, number of leaves and culm diameter) of indigenous Bamboo species and reduction of faecal contaminants were monitored. Loading of FS was carried out in a single batch twice per week with a hydraulic loading rate of 56.47/mm/d with an annual Total Solid loading rate of 155.6 and 233.2 kg TS/m

Indexed as

Bamboo speciesBiocharConstructed wetlandEffluent qualityFaecal sludge

Identifiers

PMID36582721
PMCPMC9793281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.