Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36582715›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Implementation and validation of a probabilistic linkage method for population databases without identification variables.

Amado D Quezada-Sánchez, Iván Espín-Arellano, Evangelina Morales-Carmona, Diana Molina-Vélez, Lina Sofía Palacio-Mejía, Edgar Leonel González-González, Mariana Alvarez Aceves, Juan Eugenio Hernández-Ávila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amado D Quezada-SánchezCenter for Evaluation and Surveys Research, National Institute of Public Health. Av. Universidad 655 Col. Sta. María Ahuacatitlán. C.P. 62100. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Iván Espín-ArellanoCenter for Evaluation and Surveys Research, National Institute of Public Health. Av. Universidad 655 Col. Sta. María Ahuacatitlán. C.P. 62100. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Evangelina Morales-CarmonaCenter for Evaluation and Surveys Research, National Institute of Public Health. Av. Universidad 655 Col. Sta. María Ahuacatitlán. C.P. 62100. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Diana Molina-VélezCenter for Evaluation and Surveys Research, National Institute of Public Health. Av. Universidad 655 Col. Sta. María Ahuacatitlán. C.P. 62100. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Lina Sofía Palacio-MejíaConacyt - National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655 Col., Sta. María Ahuacatitlán, C.P. 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Edgar Leonel González-GonzálezCenter for Evaluation and Surveys Research, National Institute of Public Health. Av. Universidad 655 Col. Sta. María Ahuacatitlán. C.P. 62100. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Mariana Alvarez AcevesConacyt - National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655 Col., Sta. María Ahuacatitlán, C.P. 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Juan Eugenio Hernández-ÁvilaCenter for Evaluation and Surveys Research, National Institute of Public Health. Av. Universidad 655 Col. Sta. María Ahuacatitlán. C.P. 62100. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linking records of the same person from different sources makes it possible to build administrative cohorts and perform longitudinal analyzes, as an alternative to traditional cohort studies, and have important practical implications in producing knowledge in public health. We implemented the Fellegi-Sunter probabilistic linkage method to a sample of records from the Mexican Automated System for Hospital Discharges and the Statistical and Epidemiological System for Deaths and evaluated its performance. The records in each source were randomly divided into a training sample (25%) and a validation sample (75%). We evaluated different types of blocking in terms of complexity reduction and pairs completeness, and record linkage in terms of sensitivity and positive predictive value. In the validation sample, a blocking scheme based on trigrams of the full name achieved 95.76% pairs completeness and 99.9996% complexity reduction. After pairs classification, we achieved a sensitivity of 90.72% and a positive predictive value of 97.10% in the validation sample. Both values were about one percentage point higher than that obtained in the automatic classification without clerical review of potential pairs. We concluded that the linkage algorithm achieved a good performance in terms of sensitivity and positive predictive value and can be used to build administrative cohorts for the epidemiological analysis of populations with records in health information systems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmBlockingHospital dischargeInformation systemsMortalityProbabilityRecord linkage

Identifiers

PMID36582715
PMCPMC9793263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.