Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36582708›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

The effect of noisome preparation methods in encapsulating 5-fluorouracil and real time cell assay against HCT-116 colon cancer cell line.

Onyinyechi Lydia Ugorji, Ogochukwu Ngozi Chidimma Umeh, Chukwuma Obumneme Agubata, Dickson Adah, Nicholas Chinedu Obitte, Amarauche Chukwu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Niosomal Encapsulation ofPharmaceutics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Development ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Onyinyechi Lydia UgorjiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Industrial Pharmacy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Ogochukwu Ngozi Chidimma UmehDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Industrial Pharmacy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Chukwuma Obumneme AgubataDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Industrial Pharmacy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Dickson AdahDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Clinical research center Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.
Nicholas Chinedu ObitteDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Industrial Pharmacy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Amarauche ChukwuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Industrial Pharmacy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
University of Nigeria · NGLund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formulation of niosomes is influenced by a number of variables, and these variables may eventually affect the formulation's outcome. One of the elements that can influence the physico-chemical properties of niosomes is the method used in preparation of the formulation. In this study, we established if various methods of preparation have any impact on the prepared vesicles when loaded with 5-fluorouracil. Thereafter, a real-time cell assay (an in vitro cytotoxicity test) against HCT-116 colon cancer cell lines was done on an optimised batch. 5-fluorouracil loaded niosomes were prepared with either Tween 60 or Span 60 by four different methods - namely thin film hydration (TFH), reverse phase evaporation (RPE), evaporation/sonication (EVP/SON), and the ethanol injection method (EIM). In vitro evaluations were done on the formulations, and these included particle size analysis, entrapment efficiency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), photomicrography, drug release, polydispersity index, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The effects of the preparation method and type of non-ionic surfactants on encapsulation efficiency, particle size, and in vitro drug release of the niosomes at pH 7.4 were evaluated. An

Indexed as

5 FluorouracilCholesterolNiosomesRTCASpan 60Tween 60

Identifiers

PMID36582708
PMCPMC9793284
OpenAlexW4312056314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.