ArticleHeliyon2022
The direction choice of green technological progress and late-development advantage in central and Western China.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying biased technical progress in China: Heterogeneous human capital and labor force dynamics.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Sustaining the future: How green capabilities and digitalization drive sustainability in modern business.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Analysis of Carbon Emission Projections and Reduction Potential of Resource-Dependent Urban Agglomerations from the Perspective of Multiple Scenarios-A Case Study of Hu-Bao-O-Yu Urban Agglomeration.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ecological environment is more fragile in Central and Western China, and it is a vital and difficult issue to achieve both economic catch-up and environmental protection. This paper tries to release the above dilemma by combination of the late-development advantage with the choice of the direction of green technological progress. It is concerned with whether Central and Western China are more likely to choose green technological progress due to the comparative advantage of human capital under environmental regulation, and whether green technological progress brings late-development advantages to these regions. Based on theoretical analysis, this paper adopts the system generalized moment estimation method to make empirical research on China's provincial and regional panel data from 1995 to 2020. The results indicate that human capital significantly promotes the progress of green technology; environmental regulation has a U-shaped impact on green technology progress, whereas China's current environmental regulation is propitious to promoting green technology progress; the human capital in Central and Western China is vitally important in promoting the progress of green technology, and the inflection point of environmental regulation to promoting the progress of green technology is lower than that in Eastern China, so the central and western China choose the direction of green technology progress more between the two types of technologies and therefore obtain greater growth benefits from the progress of green technology. The above results show that the comparative advantage of human capital in Central and Western China promotes the direction choice of green technological progress under reasonable environmental regulations, then the green technological progress further brings the late-development advantage of economic growth in Central and Western China. This research has a certain contribution to the research of green development and late-development advantage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.