ArticleHeliyon2022
Efficacy and safety of intrauterine device placement during a planned cesarean section.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Approximately 79% of pregnancies conceived within the first year after delivery are unintended and 50% of the couples report having unprotected intercourse before the first routine postpartum appointment. Unintended pregnancies are associated with unsafe abortions and other poor outcomes. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of intrauterine device (IUD) placement during a planned cesarean section (CS) at one year after insertion. Study Design: A survey-based retrospective cohort study conducted at a university teaching hospital. The study cohort included term pregnant women delivered by a planned CS between December 2016 and July 2020, and data collection and questionnaires were completed in July 2021. In the study group, copper or Levonorgestrel IUDs were placed through the uterine incision after delivery of the fetus and placenta, while women in the control group did not receive an IUD. Other perioperative managements were similar. The primary outcome was unintended pregnancy rate during the first year after delivery. Results: The study comprised a total of 150 women, with 50 and 100 in the study and control groups, respectively. None of the women in the study group became pregnant, compared with nine (9%) in the controls (p = 0.03), of them eight (88.9%) were unplanned. Perioperative outcome was comparable between groups. The rate of contraceptive use one year after delivery was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (86.0% vs. 35.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion: IUD placement during CS is effective in preventing unintended pregnancies within the first year after delivery, with operative outcomes unaffected. Implications: Intrauterine device (IUD) placement during a planned cesarean section prevented unintended pregnancies within one year after birth. Additionally, the rate of contraceptive use at one year was significantly higher compared to women who elected not to have an IUD inserted during the cesarean. IUD placement did not affect perioperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.