ArticleCureus2022
Dermal Matrices: Do We Always Know What Is Going On?
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of dermal matrices in abdominal wall reconstruction has gained increased attention over time, particularly in contaminated fields. One of their advantages is the greater capacity to resist infection. We report a case of a 36-year-old man, with congenital bladder exstrophy and neobladder reconstruction during childhood. He presented to us with an abdominal hernia associated with a vesicocutaneous fistula. We used a bovine-derived dermal matrix (SurgiMend®, TEI Biosciences, MA, USA) for reinforcement of the abdominal repair considering its laboratory-proven mechanical superiority regarding strength. The early postoperative period was complicated by an infection that led to mesh disintegration and the need for surgical revision. We believe that matrix digestion by bacterial enzymes culminated in rapid breakdown of the product. Further investigations are warranted to determine optimal selection criteria and indications of bioprosthesis in contaminated wounds. Surgeons should be cautious when selecting a biologic mesh in these cases, favoring meshes with a better integration profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.