Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36582516›Full record

ArticleEarth's future2022

The Transient Sea Level Response to External Forcing in CMIP6 Models.

Aslak Grinsted, Jonathan Bamber, Rory Bingham, Sammie Buzzard, Isabel Nias, Kelvin Ng, Jennifer Weeks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Earth's future, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Warming of +1.5 °C is too high for polar ice sheets.Communications earth & environment · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aslak GrinstedPhysics of Ice, Climate, and Earth Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1634-6009
Jonathan BamberSchool of Geographical Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2280-2819
Rory BinghamSchool of Geographical Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0609-5672
Sammie BuzzardSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0722-2549
Isabel NiasSchool of Environmental Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5657-8691
Kelvin NgSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.
Jennifer WeeksMet Office Exeter UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9929-8147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earth is warming and sea levels are rising as land-based ice is lost to melt, and oceans expand due to accumulation of heat. The pace of ice loss and steric expansion is linked to the intensity of warming. How much faster sea level will rise as climate warms is, however, highly uncertain and difficult to model. Here, we quantify the transient sea level sensitivity of the sea level budget in both models and observations. Models show little change in sensitivity to warming between the first and second half of the twenty-first century for most contributors. The exception is glaciers and ice caps (GIC) that have a greater sensitivity pre-2050 (2.8 ± 0.4 mm/yr/K) compared to later (0.7 ± 0.1 mm/yr/K). We attribute this change to the short response time of glaciers and their changing area over time. Model sensitivities of steric expansion (1.5 ± 0.2 mm/yr/K), and Greenland Ice Sheet mass loss (0.8 ± 0.2 mm/yr/K) are greater than, but still compatible with, corresponding estimates from historical data (1.4 ± 0.5 and 0.4 ± 0.2 mm/yr/K). Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) models tends to show lower rates of sea level rise (SLR) with warming (-0.0 ± 0.3 mm/yr/K) in contrast to historical estimates (0.4 ± 0.2 mm/yr/K). This apparent low bias in AIS sensitivity is only partly able to account for a similar low bias identified in the sensitivity of global mean sea level excluding GIC (3.1 ± 0.4 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4 mm/yr/K). The balance temperature, where SLR is zero, lies close to the pre-industrial value, implying that SLR can only be mitigated by substantial global cooling.

Indexed as

ice lossmodel validationprojectionssea level risesensitivitythermosteric

Identifiers

PMID36582516
PMCPMC9786795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.