ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transitioning from wet lab to artificial intelligence: a systematic review of AI predictors in CRISPR.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Bibliometric-Based Analysis of Global Trends and Collaborative Networks in Plant Genetic Engineering (1994-2024).Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence to advance CRISPR-based genome editing technologies.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- AI-enabled fungal biomanufacturing: from genome mining to the artificial intelligence virtual cell.Mycology · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Empowering Microbial Cell Factory: A Comprehensive Review.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Epigenome Engineering Using dCas Systems for Biomedical Applications and Biotechnology: Current Achievements, Opportunities and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- DeepMEns: an ensemble model for predicting sgRNA on-target activity based on multiple features.Briefings in functional genomics · 2025Article
- AI-driven advances in plant biotechnology: sharpening the edge of plant tissue culture and genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- A systematic screening assay identifies efficient small guide RNAs for CRISPR activation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Precision epigenetic editing: Technological advances, enduring challenges, and therapeutic applications.Cell chemical biology · 2024Review
- Review
- Advancing genome editing with artificial intelligence: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Deep learning in CRISPR-Cas systems: a review of recent studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR-mediated epigenome editing enables gene expression regulation without changing the underlying DNA sequence, and thus has vast potential for basic research and gene therapy. Effective selection of a single guide RNA (sgRNA) with high on-target efficiency and specificity would facilitate the application of epigenome editing tools. Here we performed an extensive analysis of CRISPR-mediated epigenome editing tools on thousands of experimentally examined on-target sites and established
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.