Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36582401›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in neurobiology2023

Visualizing advances in the future of primate neuroscience research.

Peter Janssen, Tadashi Isa, Jose Lanciego, Kirk Leech, Nikos Logothetis, Mu-Ming Poo, Anna S Mitchell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Research models to study lewy body dementia.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Imaging-based chemogenetics for dissecting neural circuits in nonhuman primates.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter JanssenLaboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Tadashi IsaGraduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
Jose LanciegoDepartment Neurosciences, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, CiberNed., Pamplona, Spain.
Kirk LeechEuropean Animal Research Association, United Kingdom.
Nikos LogothetisInternational Center for Primate Brain Research, Shanghai, China.
Mu-Ming PooInternational Center for Primate Brain Research, Shanghai, China.
Anna S MitchellDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Future neuroscience and biomedical projects involving non-human primates (NHPs) remain essential in our endeavors to understand the complexities and functioning of the mammalian central nervous system. In so doing, the NHP neuroscience researcher must be allowed to incorporate state-of-the-art technologies, including the use of novel viral vectors, gene therapy and transgenic approaches to answer continuing and emerging research questions that can only be addressed in NHP research models. This perspective piece captures these emerging technologies and some specific research questions they can address. At the same time, we highlight some current caveats to global NHP research and collaborations including the lack of common ethical and regulatory frameworks for NHP research, the limitations involving animal transportation and exports, and the ongoing influence of activist groups opposed to NHP research.

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9Gene editingGene therapyTransgenicsViral vector approaches

Identifiers

PMID36582401
PMCPMC9792703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.