ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
The research frontier of cesarean section recovery: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cesarean section (CS) has become an effective means to solve dystocia and some obstetric complications, and to save the lives of women and perinatal women. Disparities in quality obstetric care and rehabilitation in CS result from differences in health care systems across regions, and more scientific and reasonable rehabilitation programmes and management measures will benefit more parturient and newborns worldwide who must take CS. In this study, we performed a bibliometric analysis to collect a graphical representation of the CS recovery. Methods: A total of 995 documents of CS recovery were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) on December 31, 2021, and then VOS viewer 1.6.18 was used for visual analysis. Results: Over the last 20 years, the researches of CS recovery have gradually increased and it will continue to grow in the next period. Anesthesia and Analgesia is the most popular journal in CS recovery. Most of the representative achievements are concentrated in the relevant institutions of European and American countries, Brendan Carvalho and Ian J. Wrench are among the outstanding scholars in this field, but the overall outcome is limited by limited regional work and lack of broad cooperation and representation. "CS," "surgery," "management," "recovery," "enhanced recovery," and "risk factors" are high frequency keywords, and there is a close relationship between "management" and "enhanced recovery" around the CS and they also become one of the key factors to regulate the condition of patients. Conclusion: This work firstly analyzed the research condition of CS recovery by a bibliometric analysis. According to the practice guideline, it produces some outstanding representative productions, which involves enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and will continue to be the focus of researchers. More substantive research articles and large-scale clinical studies may greatly enhance the scientific value, and it is necessary to strengthen the ERAS guideline and cooperation between researchers, generate broader consensus and results, and ultimately provide help for CS recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.