ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Novel potential biomarkers for severe alcoholic liver disease.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Steatotic liver disease: non-invasive assessment and biomarkers across metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease with moderate alcohol consumption and alcohol-associated liver disease.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
- Novel biomarkers for alcohol-associated liver disease and their implications across clinical settings.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
- Biomarkers From the Microbiome to Predict ALD Progression and Its Severity: A Comprehensive Review.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Review
- Knockout of IGFBP3 improves alcohol-induced liver injury via Akt/GSK3β and TMEM219/caspase 8 pathways.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic delays in alcoholic cirrhosis: A cross-sectional study of contributing factors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- IGFBP3 enhances adipose-derived stem cell function in soft tissue injury repair via ITGB1 and ERK pathway activation.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Article
- Endocrine and cellular physiology and pathology of the insulin-like growth factor acid-labile subunit.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2024Review
- Plasma ALS and Gal-3BP differentiate early from advanced liver fibrosis in MASLD patients.Biomarker research · 2024Article
- Protective Effects ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Identification and quantification of the molecular species of bilirubin BDG, BMG and UCB by LC‒MS/MS in hyperbilirubinemic human serum.PloS one · 2024Article
- New Diagnostic and Prognostic Models for the Development of Alcoholic Cirrhosis Based on Genetic Predisposition and Alcohol History.Biomedicines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a leading cause of advanced liver disease; however, minor clinical symptoms in the early stage frequently result in delayed diagnosis and therapy. Invasive liver biopsy, the gold standard for diagnosing ALD, is unsuitable for repetitive analysis. This study aims to identify potential serum biomarkers that could contribute to non-invasive disease screening and monitoring. Methods: Label-free LC-MS/MS quantitative proteomics analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed proteins in the discovery cohort, followed by bioinformatics analysis based on the KEGG, GO, and String databases. Prioritized proteins were validated subsequently by quantitative assays. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess the diagnosis performance of potential biomarkers. Results: A total of 161 differentially expressed proteins were identified in the discovery cohort, of which 123 were up-regulated and 38 were down-regulated. B2M, IGFALS, and IGFBP3 were evaluated, and all demonstrated excellent diagnosis performance with AUROCs of over 0.9 when distinguishing patients with severe ALD from healthy controls. The AUROC values of B2M, IGFBP3, and IGFALS were 0.7131, 0.8877, and 0.9896 for differentiating severe ALD from non-severe ALD to indicate disease severity. B2M could distinguish patients with non-severe ALD and HC participants with an AUROC value of 0.8985. The efficiency of multiple combinations of these biomarkers was superior to that of the existing liver fibrosis evaluation indices used to monitor disease progression, with AUROC values of over 0.9. IGFALS showed a positive correlation with ALT/AST (r=0.4648, Conclusion: This proteomic study identified three novel candidate proteins as promising circulating biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and disease progression and also provided the proteomic atlas for ALD pathophysiological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.