Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36582007›Full record

SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2022

A systematic review and meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Wei Liu, Tiantian Zhang, Qian Zhang, Li Li, Chunhua Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel FABP4Cell death & disease · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei LiuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 215 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China.
Tiantian ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 215 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China.
Qian ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 215 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China.
Li LiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 215 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China.
Chunhua XuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 215 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China. xuch2188@163.com.
Nanjing Brain Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease with different subtypes, multidisciplinary teams-led management, and a poor prognosis. Currently, the clinical benefits of stage III NSCLC in the neoadjuvant setting are still unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of published data on neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III NSCLC to systematically evaluate its efficacy and safety.

methodsWe searched the databases to identify eligible studies of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage III NSCLC. The primary outcomes mainly included pathological and radiological response outcomes, the feasibility of surgery, and the safety of the regimen. The pathological and radiological response included the rate of major pathologic response (MPR), complete pathologic response (pCR), radiological response outcomes, and R0 resection; The feasibility included the rate of surgical resection, conversion to thoracotomy, surgical complications, pathological downstaging of clinical disease stage. The safety included the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs). R 4.1.3 software was conducted for data analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsNine trials containing a total of 382 populations were eligible for the meta-analysis, with the pooled surgical resection rate of 90%. Owing to the large heterogeneity of the single-rate meta-analysis, the random effect model was adopted. The estimated pooled prevalence of MPR was 56% (95%CI 0.39-0.72) and of pCR was 39% (95%CI 0.28-0.51). The pooled rate of TRAEs was 65% (95%CI 0.17-0.99) and SAEs was 24% (95%CI 0.05-0.49).

conclusionCompared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy achieved more pathological and radiological relief, and has a high surgical resection rate and low risk of conversion to thoracotomy and surgical complications, with poor tolerance of toxicity but rarely developing life-threatening adverse events. In conclusion, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is suggested to be beneficial for stage III NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingNeoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapyNon-small cell lung cancerSafety and efficacyStage III

Identifiers

PMID36582007
PMCPMC9798701
OpenAlexW4313238101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.