Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581944›Full record

Observational studyThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2022

Device-measured physical activity and sedentary time in a national sample of Luxembourg residents: the ORISCAV-LUX 2 study.

Paul J Collings, Anne Backes, Gloria A Aguayo, Laurent Malisoux, ORISCAV-LUX study group

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparing national device-based physical activity surveillance systems: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul J CollingsPhysical Activity, Sport and Health Research Group, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 1A-B, rue Thomas Edison, Strassen, L-1445, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-2022-5453
Anne BackesPhysical Activity, Sport and Health Research Group, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 1A-B, rue Thomas Edison, Strassen, L-1445, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-2026-5762
Gloria A AguayoDeep Digital Phenotyping Research Unit, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 1A-B, rue Thomas Edison, Strassen, L-1445, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-5625-1664
Laurent MalisouxPhysical Activity, Sport and Health Research Group, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 1A-B, rue Thomas Edison, Strassen, L-1445, Luxembourg. laurent.malisoux@lih.lu.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-5630
ORISCAV-LUX study group
Luxembourg Institute of Health · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting information about population physical activity (PA) levels and sedentary time in Luxembourg are based on self-reported data.

methodsThis observational study included Luxembourg residents aged 18-79y who each provided ≥4 valid days of triaxial accelerometry in 2016-18 (n=1122). Compliance with the current international PA guideline (≥150 min moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) per week, irrespective of bout length) was quantified and variability in average 24h acceleration (indicative of PA volume), awake-time PA levels, sedentary time and accumulation pattern were analysed by linear regression. Data were weighted to be nationally representative.

resultsParticipants spent 51% of daily time sedentary (mean (95% confidence interval (CI)): 12.1 (12.0 to 12.2) h/day), 11% in light PA (2.7 (2.6 to 2.8) h/day), 6% in MVPA (1.5 (1.4 to 1.5) h/day), and remaining time asleep (7.7 (7.6 to 7.7) h/day). Adherence to the PA guideline was high (98.1%). Average 24h acceleration and light PA were higher in women than men, but men achieved higher average accelerations across the most active periods of the day. Women performed less sedentary time and shorter sedentary bouts. Older participants (aged ≥55y) registered a lower average 24h acceleration and engaged in less MVPA, more sedentary time and longer sedentary bouts. Average 24h acceleration was higher in participants of lower educational attainment, who also performed less sedentary time, shorter bouts, and fewer bouts of prolonged sedentariness. Average 24h acceleration and levels of PA were higher in participants with standing and manual occupations than a sedentary work type, but manual workers registered lower average accelerations across the most active periods of the day. Standing and manual workers accumulated less sedentary time and fewer bouts of prolonged sedentariness than sedentary workers. Active commuting to work was associated with higher average 24h acceleration and MVPA, both of which were lower in participants of poorer self-rated health and higher weight status. Obesity was associated with less light PA, more sedentary time and longer sedentary bouts.

conclusionsAdherence to recommended PA is high in Luxembourg, but half of daily time is spent sedentary. Specific population subgroups will benefit from targeted efforts to replace sedentary time with PA.

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorAccelerometryFemaleHumansLuxembourgMaleObesityTransportationAdultsBehaviourCorrelatesDemographic factorsHealth statusInactivityLifestyleObesitySittingSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID36581944
PMCPMC9798598
OpenAlexW4313242254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.