Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581936›Full record

ArticlePatient safety in surgery2022

Correlation between intracranial pressure monitoring for severe traumatic brain injury with hospital length of stay and discharge disposition: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Christopher W Foote, Stephanie Jarvis, Xuan-Lan Doan, Jordan Guice, Bianca Cruz, Cheryl Vanier, Alejandro Betancourt, David Bar-Or, Carlos H Palacio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impacts of intracranial pressure monitoring on mortality and length of stay in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Brain compliance: a new assessment for clinical practice?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher W FooteMcAllen Medical Center, South Texas Health System, 301 W Expy 83, McAllen, TX, 78503, USA.
Stephanie JarvisInjury Outcomes Network (ION) Research, 501 East Hampden Ave, Englewood, CO, 80113, USA.
Xuan-Lan DoanMcAllen Medical Center, South Texas Health System, 301 W Expy 83, McAllen, TX, 78503, USA.
Jordan GuiceBrooke Army Medical Center, 8551 Roger Brooke Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78219, USA.
Bianca CruzMcAllen Medical Center, South Texas Health System, 301 W Expy 83, McAllen, TX, 78503, USA.
Cheryl VanierTouro University, School of Medicine, 874 American Pacific Dr, Henderson, NV, 89014, USA.
Alejandro BetancourtMcAllen Medical Center, South Texas Health System, 301 W Expy 83, McAllen, TX, 78503, USA.
David Bar-OrInjury Outcomes Network (ION) Research, 501 East Hampden Ave, Englewood, CO, 80113, USA. davidbme49@gmail.com.
Carlos H PalacioMcAllen Medical Center, South Texas Health System, 301 W Expy 83, McAllen, TX, 78503, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIntracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is recommended for severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI) but some data suggests it may not improve outcomes. The objective was to investigate the effect of ICP monitoring among TBI.

methodsThis retrospective observational cohort study (1/1/2015-6/1/2020) included severe TBI patients. Outcomes [discharge destination, length of stay (LOS)] were compared by ICP monitoring and were stratified by GCS (3 vs. 4-8), α < 0.05.

resultsOf the123 patients who met inclusion criteria, 47% received ICP monitoring. There were baseline differences in the two groups characteristics, ICP monitored patients were younger (p = 0.02), had a subarachnoid hemorrhage less often (p = 0.04), and a subdural hematoma more often (p = 0.04) than those without ICP monitors. ICP monitored patients had a significantly longer median LOS (12 vs. 3, p < 0.01) than patients without monitoring. There was a trend towards more ICP monitored patients discharged home (40% vs. 23%, p = 0.06). Among patients with GCS = 3, ICP monitored patients had a longer LOS (p < 0.01) with no significant differences in discharge destinations. For those with a GCS of 4-8, ICP monitoring was associated with a longer LOS (p = 0.01), but fewer were discharged to a skilled nursing facility or long-term care (p = 0.01).

conclusionsFor TBI patients, ICP monitoring was associated with an increased LOS, with no significant differences in discharge destinations when compared to those without ICP monitoring. However, among only those with a GCS of 4-8, ICP monitoring was associated with a decreased proportion of patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility or long-term acute care .

Indexed as

GuidelineIntracranial hypertensionIntracranial pressure monitorTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36581936
PMCPMC9801642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.