Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581930›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2022

The company we keep. Using hemodialysis social network data to classify patients' kidney transplant attitudes with machine learning algorithms.

Rafaa Aljurbua, Avrum Gillespie, Zoran Obradovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rafaa AljurbuaCenter for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
Avrum GillespieDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Hypertension, and Kidney Transplantation, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. avrum.gillespie@tuhs.temple.edu.
Zoran ObradovicCenter for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

Social Network Analysis and Renal Education to Promote Transplantation (SNARE Transplant)K23DK111943 · NIDDK · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GILLESPIE, AVRUM · 2017 to 2021
$904k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK111943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemodialysis clinic patient social networks may reinforce positive and negative attitudes towards kidney transplantation. We examined whether a patient's position within the hemodialysis clinic social network could improve machine learning classification of the patient's positive or negative attitude towards kidney transplantation when compared to sociodemographic and clinical variables.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional social network survey of hemodialysis patients in two geographically and demographically different hemodialysis clinics. We evaluated whether machine learning logistic regression models using sociodemographic or network data best predicted the participant's transplant attitude. Models were evaluated for accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.

resultsThe 110 surveyed participants' mean age was 60 ± 13 years old. Half (55%) identified as male, and 74% identified as Black. At facility 1, 69% of participants had a positive attitude towards transplantation whereas at facility 2, 45% of participants had a positive attitude. The machine learning logistic regression model using network data alone obtained a higher accuracy and F1 score than the sociodemographic and clinical data model (accuracy 65% ± 5% vs. 61% ± 7%, F1 score 76% ± 2% vs. 70% ± 7%). A model with a combination of both sociodemographic and network data had a higher accuracy of 74% ± 3%, and an F1-score of 81% ± 2%.

conclusionSocial network data improved the machine learning algorithm's ability to classify attitudes towards kidney transplantation, further emphasizing the importance of hemodialysis clinic social networks on attitudes towards transplant.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAgedAlgorithmsAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRenal DialysisSocial NetworkingHemodialysisKidney transplantationMachine LearningPsychosocialSocial Determinants of HealthSocial NetworkSurvey Research

Identifiers

PMID36581930
PMCPMC9798634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.