Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581910›Full record

ArticleBMC rheumatology2022

Erosion-free rheumatoid arthritis: clinical and conceptional implications-a BARFOT study.

Björn Svensson, Maria L E Andersson, Inger Gjertsson, Ingiäld Hafström, Sofia Ajeganova, Kristina Forslind

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Autoantibodies Serum Level and 10-Year Risk of Fractures Evaluated by FRAXOpen access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Björn SvenssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. b.o.svensson@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6501-2908
Maria L E AnderssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-5029
Inger GjertssonDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9301-4844
Ingiäld HafströmDivision of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9151-758X
Sofia AjeganovaDivision of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-9717
Kristina ForslindDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1692-9597
Lund University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone erosions may appear early or later during rheumatoid arthritis (RA), causing joint damage and functional impairment. However, in some patients erosions do not occur, even after several years of disease. This study evaluates the prevalence, clinical relevance and possible predictors of erosion-free RA.

methodsSix hundred and eight patients from an early RA cohort (BARFOT) having radiographs of hands and feet at inclusion and after 1, 2, 5 and 8 years were studied. Clinical and functional assessments were performed on all these time-points.

resultsIn all, 144 patients (24%) did not develop erosions up to 8 years follow-up (Never erosive group), while 464 patients (76%) had erosions on one or more assessments (Ever erosive group). At diagnosis, the patients in the Never erosive group were significantly younger, satisfied fewer ACR criteria, and were less frequently RF- and/or anti-CCP- positive compared with those in the Ever erosive group. The Never erosive patients had consistently more tender joints, lower erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and, from two years and onwards, fewer swollen joints. Absence of rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-CCP were strong independent predictors for erosion-free disease. The erosion-free patients were less frequently treated with DMARDs and/or prednisolone.

conclusionsOne-quarter of the patients was erosion-free during eight years in this early RA cohort. Erosion-free patients had a less severe disease course as to disease activity and were more often seronegative compared with those with erosive disease. The results suggest that non-erosive RA represents a milder form of RA.

Indexed as

ACR criteriaDisease progressErosion-freeErosionsPrognosisRadiographyRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID36581910
PMCPMC9801569
OpenAlexW4313332033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.