Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581862›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

A hybrid sampling algorithm combining synthetic minority over-sampling technique and edited nearest neighbor for missed abortion diagnosis.

Fangyuan Yang, Kang Wang, Lisha Sun, Mengjiao Zhai, Jiejie Song, Hong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. TNFMolecular diversity · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fangyuan YangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, Henan, China.
Kang WangAutobio Labtec Instruments Co. Ltd., Zhengzhou, 450016, Henan, China.
Lisha SunDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, Henan, China.
Mengjiao ZhaiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, Henan, China.
Jiejie SongDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, Henan, China.
Hong WangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, Henan, China. hongwang197408@outlook.com.

Funding

Henan Medical Science and Technology Tackling Project LHGJ20191350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical diagnosis based on machine learning usually uses case samples as training samples, and uses machine learning to construct disease prediction models characterized by descriptive texts of clinical manifestations. However, the problem of sample imbalance often exists in the medical field, which leads to a decrease in classification performance of the machine learning.

methodsTo solve the problem of sample imbalance in medical dataset, we propose a hybrid sampling algorithm combining synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) and edited nearest neighbor (ENN). Firstly, the SMOTE is used to over-sampling missed abortion and diabetes datasets, so that the number of samples of the two classes is balanced. Then, ENN is used to under-sampling the over-sampled dataset to delete the "noisy sample" in the majority. Finally, Random forest is used to model and predict the sampled missed abortion and diabetes datasets to achieve an accurate clinical diagnosis.

resultsExperimental results show that Random forest has the best classification performance on missed abortion and diabetes datasets after SMOTE-ENN sampled, and the MCC index is 95.6% and 90.0%, respectively. In addition, the results of pairwise comparison and multiple comparisons show that the SMOTE-ENN is significantly better than other sampling algorithms.

conclusionRandom forest has significantly improved all indexes on the missed abortion dataset after SMOTE-ENN sampled.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, MissedAlgorithmsDecision TreesFemaleHumansMachine LearningPregnancyRandom ForestData samplingDecision treeEnsemble algorithmImbalanced medical data

Identifiers

PMID36581862
PMCPMC9801640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.