Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581854›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2022

The effects of neutral argon plasma versus electrocoagulation on tissue in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a case series.

Gatske M Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer, Nick J van de Berg, Xu Shan Gao, Patricia C Ewing-Graham, Heleen J van Beekhuizen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gatske M Nieuwenhuyzen-de BoerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. g.nieuwenhuyzen-deboer@erasmusmc.nl.
Nick J van de BergDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Xu Shan GaoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Patricia C Ewing-GrahamDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Heleen J van BeekhuizenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

ZonMw 843001805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer is a complete cytoreduction, because this is the most important independent prognostic factor for prolonged survival. Yet this can be difficult to achieve when there are micrometastases on the intestinal mesentery or intestines. The PlasmaJet device is an instrument to remove these micrometastases, but little is known about the depth of damage in human tissue compared to electrocoagulation devices.

methodsA prospective study was performed for the ex-vivo comparison of the histological depth of thermal damage of neutral argon plasma (PlasmaJet®) and electrocoagulation devices, in a series of 106 histological slides of 17 advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients. Depending on the tissue types resected during complete cytoreductive surgery, samples were collected from reproductive organs (uterus, ovaries), intestines (ileum, colon, rectum) and omentum, intestinal mesentery and peritoneum.

resultsAverage thermal damage depth was 0.15 mm (range 0.03-0.60 mm) after use of neutral argon plasma and 0.33 mm (range 0.08-1.80 mm) after use of electrocoagulation (p < 0.001). Greater disruption of the tissue surface was often observed after electrocoagulation.

conclusionOur case series suggests that the use of neutral argon plasma during cytoreductive surgery produces significantly less thermal damage than electrocoagulation treatment. It is therefore considered a thermally safe alternative, aiding in the achievement of cytoreductive surgery.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsPlasma GasesArgonCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresElectrocoagulationFemaleHumansNeoplasm MicrometastasisProspective StudiesArgonPlasma GasesCytoreductive surgeryElectrocoagulationHistologyNeutral argon plasmaOvarian cancerOvarian neoplasmsPlasmaJet®Thermal damage depth

Identifiers

PMID36581854
PMCPMC9798615
OpenAlexW4313331338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.