Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581843›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

The influence of day 3 embryo cell number on the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of day 5 single blastocyst transfer from frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Jie Wang, Zhenyu Diao, Junshun Fang, Lihua Zhu, Zhipeng Xu, Fei Lin, Ningyuan Zhang, Linjun Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jie Wang *Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, Nanjing, China.
Zhenyu Diao *Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, Nanjing, China.
Junshun FangCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, Nanjing, China.
Lihua ZhuCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, Nanjing, China.
Zhipeng XuCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, Nanjing, China.
Fei LinCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, Nanjing, China.
Ningyuan ZhangCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, Nanjing, China.
Linjun ChenCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, Nanjing, China. chenlinjun158@163.com.

Funding

the Nanjing Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation YKK15070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the influence of day 3 embryo cell number on the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of day 5 single blastocyst transfer in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

methodsOur retrospective study included 3761 day 5 single blastocyst FET cycles between January 2015 and December 2019. These FET cycles were divided into three groups according to the day 3 embryo cell number: 939 cycles in the < 8-cell group, 1224 cycles in the 8-cell group and 1598 cycles in the > 8-cell group. The clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were compared among the three groups.

resultsThe clinical pregnancy rate of day 5 single blastocyst transfer in FET cycles increased significantly as the day 3 embryo cell number increased (52.2%, 61.4% and 66.8%, P < 0.001). Similarly, the live birth rate increased significantly as the day 3 embryo cell number increased (42.7%, 49.8% and 54.9%, P < 0.001). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were not significantly different among the three groups when good-quality blastocysts were transferred. The clinical pregnancy and live birth rates increased significantly as the day 3 embryo cell number increased when fair- and poor-quality blastocysts were transferred.

conclusionThe day 3 embryo cell number needs to be considered when day 5 single blastocyst transfer is performed in FET cycles, especially when fair- and poor-quality blastocysts are used for transfer. The transfer of a day 5 single blastocyst derived from an embryo with faster development on day 3 may shorten the time to achieving a live birth.

Indexed as

Birth RateCryopreservationCell CountEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesBlastocystClinical pregnancyEmbryoFrozen embryo transferLive birth

Identifiers

PMID36581843
PMCPMC9798545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.