ArticleSpinal cord2023
Prevalence of an insufficient vitamin D status at the onset of a spinal cord injury - a cross-sectional study.
Article in Spinal cord, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Vitamin D deficiency and neuropathic pain in chronic spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Evaluating initial screening practices for calcium dysregulation after acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective review.Spinal cord series and cases · 2024Article
- Vitamin D Supplementation in Functional Recovery of Subjects with Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Controlled Randomized Study.Neurotrauma reports · 2024Article
- 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Vitamin D3 Supplementation During Postacute Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designA cross-sectional study.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the vitamin D status after acute spinal cord injury (SCI) onset.
settingSpecialized SCI rehabilitation center in Switzerland.
methodsPatients admitted to the center after an acute SCI onset were included. The prevalence of a deficient (25(OH)D ≤ 50 nmol/l), insufficient (50 < 25(OH)D ≤ 75 nmol/l) and sufficient (25(OH)D > 75 nmol/l) vitamin D status were determined after admission. Vitamin D status was compared between different patient groups based on demographic and SCI characteristics. The occurrence of bed rest, falls and pressure injuries were also assessed.
resultsIn total, 87 patients (median (interquartile range); 53 (39-67) years, 25 females, 66 traumatic SCI, 54 paraplegia) were included. Assessed a median of 15 (9-22) days after SCI onset, median vitamin D status was 41 (26-57) (range 8-155) nmol/l. The majority of patients had a deficient (67%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.56-0.76) or insufficient (25%, 95% CI 0.17-0.36) vitamin D status. A moderate negative correlation was found between vitamin D status and body mass index (p = 0.003). A moderate positive correlation was found between vitamin D and calcium status (p = 0.01).
conclusionA deficient or insufficient vitamin D status directly after SCI onset is highly prevalent. Vitamin D status should be carefully observed during acute SCI rehabilitation. We recommend that all patients with recent SCI onset should receive vitamin D supplementation with a dosage depending on their actual vitamin D status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.