Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581696›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2022

Optimized detection of homologous recombination deficiency improves the prediction of clinical outcomes in cancer.

Fernando Perez-Villatoro, Jaana Oikkonen, Julia Casado, Anastasiya Chernenko, Doga C Gulhan, Manuela Tumiati, Yilin Li, Kari Lavikka, Sakari Hietanen, Johanna Hynninen and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genomic and Epigenomic ctDNA Profiling in Liquid Biopsies from Heavily Pretreated Patients with DNA Damage Response-Deficient Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Advances in Systemic Therapy for Ovarian Cancer Over the Past Decade: A Clinical and Molecular Perspective.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Challenges to Innovation Arising from Current Companion Diagnostic Regulations and Suggestions for Improvements.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando Perez-VillatoroResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5419-8484
Jaana OikkonenResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Julia CasadoResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anastasiya ChernenkoResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Doga C GulhanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Manuela TumiatiResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Yilin LiResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Kari LavikkaResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4163-4945
Sakari HietanenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4734-4743
Johanna HynninenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0854-7225
Ulla-Maija HaltiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaakko S TyrmiCenter for Child, Adolescent, and Maternal Health Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Hannele LaivuoriCenter for Child, Adolescent, and Maternal Health Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3212-7826
Panagiotis A KonstantinopoulosDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1032-1479
Sampsa HautaniemiResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7749-2694
Liisa KauppiResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6759-8997
Anniina FärkkiläResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. anniina.farkkila@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3558-6617
University of Helsinki · FIHarvard University · USUniversity of Turku · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FITampere University · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) 314398Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) 322178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homologous recombination DNA-repair deficiency (HRD) is a common driver of genomic instability and confers a therapeutic vulnerability in cancer. The accurate detection of somatic allelic imbalances (AIs) has been limited by methods focused on BRCA1/2 mutations and using mixtures of cancer types. Using pan-cancer data, we revealed distinct patterns of AIs in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). We used machine learning and statistics to generate improved criteria to identify HRD in HGSC (ovaHRDscar). ovaHRDscar significantly predicted clinical outcomes in three independent patient cohorts with higher precision than previous methods. Characterization of 98 spatiotemporally distinct metastatic samples revealed low intra-patient variation and indicated the primary tumor as the preferred site for clinical sampling in HGSC. Further, our approach improved the prediction of clinical outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (tnbcHRDscar), validated in two independent patient cohorts. In conclusion, our tumor-specific, systematic approach has the potential to improve patient selection for HR-targeted therapies.

Identifiers

PMID36581696
PMCPMC9800569
OpenAlexW4313332611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.