Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581674›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Identification of Lactobacillus strains from human mother milk and cottage cheese revealed potential probiotic properties with enzymatic activity.

Abeer I M El-Sayed, Aliaa M El-Borai, Sara H Akl, Samy A El-Aassar, Mohamed S Abdel-Latif

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. ProbioticBrain sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abeer I M El-SayedBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Damanhour University, El-Beheira, Egypt.
Aliaa M El-BoraiBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Sara H AklMedical Laboratory Technology Department, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences Technology, Pharos University in Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.
Samy A El-AassarBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Mohamed S Abdel-LatifMedical Laboratory Technology Department, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences Technology, Pharos University in Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. mohamed.abdellatif@pua.edu.eg.
Alexandria University · EGPharos University in Alexandria · EGDamanhour University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main attempt of this study is to isolate, determine potential probiotic properties and enzyme production of some lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Among all isolates, two LAB strains isolated from human mother milk and cottage cheese revealed antimicrobial activity against some tested pathogenic strains. Both isolates inhibited all the tested pathogens except Escherichia coli. The two isolates were identified by morphological, biochemical properties and then by 16S rRNA gene sequencing technique as Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2. Potential probiotic characters were investigated. Both strains survived in relatively low pH and high bile concentrations and were able to grow at 0.5% of pancreatin concentrations. Their growth decreased by increasing phenol from 0.2% till 0.5%. Both strains did not show hemolytic activity. Coaggregation potential was exhibited by the two strains against Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. Hydrophobicity of Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2, with ethyl acetate; were 88.1% and 82.8%, respectively. Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 was susceptible to Ampicillin, Penicillin, Erythromycin, Ciprofloxacin and Tetracycline; on the contrary, it resists Vancomycin and Cefoxitin; while Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 resists all tested antibiotics. Maximum growth was achieved using glucose as a carbon source and yeast extract as nitrogen source for both strains; however, glucose is the most preferred carbon source for microorganisms and it prevents the uptake of carbon from other sources like yeast by catabolite repression mechanism. Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 produces lipase enzyme, while Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 produces amylase and protease.

Indexed as

CheeseLactobacillalesProbioticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coliFemaleGlucoseHumansLactobacillusLactobacillus acidophilusMilk, HumanMothersRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsGlucoseRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID36581674
PMCPMC9800376
OpenAlexW4313333185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.