Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581599›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2023

High-impact chronic pain: evaluation of risk factors and predictors.

İlteriş Ahmet Şentürk, Erman Şentürk, Işıl Üstün, Akın Gökçedağ, Nilgün Pulur Yıldırım, Nilüfer Kale İçen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Patients' interpretations of individual PROMIS-10 Global Health items: a cognitive interview study in high-impact chronic pain.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Association between quality of life before an acute pain event and the development of chronic pain-related disability.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

İlteriş Ahmet ŞentürkDepartment of Pain Medicine, Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2680-8118
Erman ŞentürkDepartment of Psychiatry, Üsküdar University NP Feneryolu Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-7905
Işıl ÜstünDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7305-6839
Akın GökçedağDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-2263
Nilgün Pulur YıldırımDepartment of Neurology, Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4567-8010
Nilüfer Kale İçenDepartment of Neurology, Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-6223
Bağcılar Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRBakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRÜsküdar University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The concept of high-impact chronic pain (HICP) has been proposed for patients with chronic pain who have significant limitations in work, social life, and personal care. Recognition of HICP and being able to distinguish patients with HICP from other chronic pain patients who do not have life interference allows the necessary measures to be taken in order to restore the physical and emotional functioning of the affected persons. The aim was to reveal the risk factors and predictors associated with HICP. Methods: Patients with chronic pain without life interference (grade 1 and 2) and patients with HICP were compared. Significant data were evaluated with regression analysis to reveal the associated risk factors. Receiving operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate predictors and present cutoff scores. Results: One thousand and six patients completed the study. From pain related cognitive processes, fear of pain (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.98; Conclusions: This is the first study in our geography to evaluate HICP with measurement tools that evaluate all dimensions of pain. Moreover, it is the first study in the literature to evaluate predictors and cut-off scores using ROC analysis for HICP.

Indexed as

AnxietyChronic PainEmotionsPainPain MeasurementPrevalenceQuality of LifeRisk FactorsROC CurveSurveys and Questionnaires.

Identifiers

PMID36581599
PMCPMC9812691
OpenAlexW4313312234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.