ArticleZhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences2022
The localization and improvement of the Functional Status Scale and the reliability and validity in very low birth weight infants.
Article in Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Gatos Clinical Test questionnaire in patients with severe dementia.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a Chinese version of Functional Status Scale (FSS) and to test its reliability and validity in very low birth weight infants (VLBWIs).
methodsThe FSS was translated into Chinese and the content was modified in accordance with relevant guidelines and specifications. The Chinese version of FSS was applied to evaluate VLBWIs admitted from January 2018 to June 2020 at 7th day after birth and 34 weeks of postmenstrual age, respectively. The scores were analyzed by descriptive statistics (coefficient of variation method, critical ratio method and answer distribution analysis method), and the reliability and the validity were analyzed. The internal consistency reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's α coefficient, the inter rater reliability was analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficient. The content validity was analyzed using correlation coefficient method and expert scoring method; the structural validity was analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis method; the known group validity was analyzed using area under the curve (AUC) value and Pearson correlation coefficient. The preliminary response of the initial and re-evaluation scales was calculated.
resultsAfter screening by inclusion and exclusion criteria, 548 and 523 VLBWIs were included for initial evaluation and re-evaluation, respectively. Descriptive statistics showed that the mean was close to the median, the maximum and minimum values were close to or equal to the values at both ends, and the coefficient of variation was >0.15. The critical ratio method showed that the |
conclusionThe Chinese version FSS scale has good reliability and validity, the included items are simple and easy to be applied in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.