Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581507›Full record

ArticleHuman immunology2023

Virtual crossmatch for deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States: A survey of histocompatibility lab directors and transplant surgeons.

Chethan M Puttarajappa, Amit D Tevar, William Hoffman, Howard Degenholtz, Carrie A Schinstock, Vikraman Gunabushanam, Adriana Zeevi, Qingyong Xu, Sundaram Hariharan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chethan M PuttarajappaDepartment of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA. Electronic address: puttarajappacm@upmc.edu.
Amit D TevarDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
William HoffmanTransplant Nephrology, UPMC Pinnacle, Harrisburg, PA, USA.
Howard DegenholtzDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Carrie A SchinstockDivision of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Vikraman GunabushanamDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Adriana ZeeviDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Qingyong XuDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Sundaram HariharanDepartment of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USMayo Clinic · USUPMC Central Pa · US

Funding

Utility of virtual crossmatch in deceased donor kidney transplantationK08DK119576 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PUTTARAJAPPA, CHETHAN · 2019 to 2023
$812k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK119576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual crossmatch (VXM) is used as an alternative to or in conjunction with a cell-based physical crossmatch (PXM) for assessing HLA (human leukocyte antigen) compatibility prior to deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Data on practice patterns and perceptions regarding VXM use in the US are limited. We performed a survey of US HLA directors and transplant surgeons regarding HLA testing and crossmatch strategies. 53 (56 %) HLA directors and 68 surgeons (representing ∼ 23 % of US transplant centers) completed the survey. Both groups agreed that VXM could reduce cold ischemia time (CIT), costs and improve allocation efficiency. VXM use increased following the 2021 kidney allocation change. Reducing CIT was the primary reason for favoring VXM over PXM. Preference for VXM reduced as candidates' panel reactive antibodies increased. Regulations, program policies and limitations of HLA technology were cited as important reasons for preferring PXM over VXM. Surgeons reported similar perceptions, but findings are limited by the low response rate. Finally, half the labs reported lacking specific protocols for VXM use. In conclusion, improved HLA technology and protocols along with changes to institutional procedures and policy regulations are needed for safer expansion of VXM in DDKT.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationBlood Grouping and CrossmatchingGraft RejectionHistocompatibilityHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansKidneyUnited StatesHLA AntigensDeceased donorHistocompatibilityKidney transplantationSurveyVirtual crossmatch

Identifiers

PMID36581507
PMCPMC9991979
OpenAlexW4313254411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.