ArticleBMJ open2022
Quality of evidence supporting the role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of anxious depression: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel anxiolytic-antidepressant combinations TF-1 and TF-2 and their intervention mechanisms in a mouse model of comorbid anxiety and depression (CAD).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- A Black Sticky Rice-Derived Functional Ingredient Improves Anxiety, Depression, and Stress Perception in Adult Volunteers.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Peripheral inflammation as a potential mechanism and preventive strategy for perioperative neurocognitive disorder under general anesthesia and surgery.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere have been several studies showing the effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for anxious depression. We aimed to summarise the evidence and evaluate the methodological quality regarding the effectiveness and safety of NSAIDs for anxious depression from systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two researchers searched seven databases for SRs/MAs, which are randomised controlled trials on NSAIDs for anxious depression. Two investigators used the Assessment System for Evaluating Methodological Quality 2, the Risk of Bias in Systematic reviews tool, the list of preferred reporting items for SRs/MAs and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system to assess the included SRs/MAs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The findings of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, and national and international conference presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.