ArticleBMJ open2022
Informed self-assessment during the transition to medical school: a longitudinal narrative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Informing factors and outcomes of self-assessment practices in medical education: a systematic review.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Discoveries or doubts: a qualitative study of the transformative potential of portfolio meetings.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025Article
- What Type of Self-Assessment Is Best for Your Educational Activity? A Review of Pre-Post, Now-Then, and Post-Only Designs.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Review
- Development, implementation, and evaluation of a flagship simulation-based capstone course for graduating medical students in the Middle East.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- How Social Support Affects Resilience in Disadvantaged Students: The Chain-Mediating Roles of School Belonging and Emotional Experience.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Perspectives from two recent medical school graduates on exposure to pathology during undergraduate medical education: A narrative inquiry.Academic pathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore how medical students' narratives of informed self-assessment (ISA) change during their first 18 months of study.
designThis longitudinal study used student narratives drawn from qualitative interviews and written reflections during the transition to medical school, to examine changes in ISA. Our analysis was informed by Situated Cognition Theory which recognises the impact and interplay of personal and environmental factors in cognition.
settingTo study medicine, first year students need to adapt their self-regulated learning in the context of a new peer group, study demands and educational culture. During this adaptation, students need to seek and interpret available cues to inform their self-assessment.
participantsLongitudinal data were collected at five time points over 18 months from a diverse sample of seven first year medical students in an undergraduate medical programme, including 13.5 hours of interviews and 12 written reflections.
resultsBefore and after starting medical school, the participants' self-assessments were informed by environmental influences (exam results and comparison with peers), and personal influences (fear of failure and anxiety about not belonging). Early uncertainty meant self-assessments were overestimated and underestimated.By the end of first year, an enhanced sense of belonging coincided with less fear of failure, less emphasis on exam performance and reduced competition with peers. Self-assessments became increasingly informed by evidence of clinical skills and knowledge gained related to future professional competence.
conclusionInfluences on medical students' ISAs change during the transition to studying medicine. A greater sense of belonging, and evidence of progress towards clinical competence became more important to self-assessment than comparison with peers and exam performance. Our findings reinforce the importance of formative assessments, opportunities to study and socialise with peers and early clinical experiences during first year. These experiences enhance ISA skills during the transition to medical school.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.