Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581428›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Individualised follow-up for head and neck cancer-design of a prospective cohort study to assess its feasibility.

Cecile van de Weerd, Julia J van Tol-Geerdink, Guido B van den Broek, Johannes H A M Kaanders, Henri A M Marres, Rosella P M G Hermens, Robert P Takes

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05386225 (Individualized Follow-Up for Head and Neck Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05386225 unknown statusnot on this map

Individualized Follow-Up for Head and Neck Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2022 to 2024Enrolled210ConditionsHead and Neck Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surveillance after treatment for head and neck cancer.Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. European Laryngological Society consensus statement on optimal monitoring schedules after treatment for early glottic cancer: a risk-stratification.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. An exploration of nursing and Allied Health Professional (AHP)-led post-treatment surveillance and survivorship care for people with head and neck cancer-a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cecile van de WeerdDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands cecile.vandeweerd@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4046-4646
Julia J van Tol-GeerdinkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Guido B van den BroekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Johannes H A M KaandersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Henri A M MarresDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Rosella P M G HermensDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Robert P TakesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is a common practice for many cancer types to monitor patients after treatment to detect new disease manifestations early. For head and neck cancer (HNC), however, long-term routine follow-up is up for debate for several reasons. The benefits of prolonged routine follow-up on survival have not been proven. Also, cancer follow-up is putting increasing pressure on healthcare resources due to rising incidence and survival rates. Therefore, this study investigates a novel follow-up approach among HNC patients, giving them the opportunity to choose their own follow-up programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: HNC patients are offered a decision-aided choice between standardised or individualised follow-up after 1.5 years of uncomplicated guideline-prescribed follow-up. Standardised follow-up entails continuing the 5-year guideline-prescribed schedule. Individualised follow-up means the patient only attends the outpatient clinic on their own initiative in case of physical symptoms or supportive care needs. Patients are educated on self-examination and when a control visit is necessary. The primary outcome measure is the feasibility of offering patients this choice. Secondary outcome measures are quality of life, costs, productivity loss and detection of new disease. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We believe that it is essential to let patients determine their follow-up programme based on their own values and preferences. If this choice is feasible, it can be implemented and investigated in other HNC care centres. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05386225.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsQuality of LifeFeasibility StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansProspective Studieshead & neck surgeryhead & neck tumoursoncologyotolaryngology

Identifiers

PMID36581428
PMCPMC9806091
OpenAlexW4313487879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.