Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36581271›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2023

Normalisation of SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in wastewater: The use of flow, electrical conductivity and crAssphage.

Jeroen Langeveld, Remy Schilperoort, Leo Heijnen, Goffe Elsinga, Claudia E M Schapendonk, Ewout Fanoy, Evelien I T de Schepper, Marion P G Koopmans, Miranda de Graaf, Gertjan Medema

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Agile, on-demand wastewater surveillance of virus infections to support pandemic and outbreak response in Rotterdam-Rijnmond, the Netherlands, 2020 to 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diurnal changes in pathogenic and indicator virus concentrations in wastewater.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeroen LangeveldSanitary Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628CN Delft, the Netherlands; Partners4UrbanWater, Graafseweg 274, 6532 ZV Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: jeroen.langeveld@urbanwater.nl.
Remy SchilperoortPartners4UrbanWater, Graafseweg 274, 6532 ZV Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Leo HeijnenKWR Water Research Institute, Groningenhaven 7, 3433PE Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Goffe ElsingaKWR Water Research Institute, Groningenhaven 7, 3433PE Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Claudia E M SchapendonkDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ewout FanoyGGD Department public health, municipality Rotterdam, Schiedamsedijk 95, 3000 LP Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Evelien I T de SchepperDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marion P G KoopmansDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Miranda de GraafDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Gertjan MedemaSanitary Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628CN Delft, the Netherlands; KWR Water Research Institute, Groningenhaven 7, 3433PE Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Natural resources, Michigan State University, 1405 S Harrison Rd, East-Lansing 48823, MI, USA.
Erasmus MC · NLKWR Water Research Institute · NLDelft University of Technology · NLGGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond · NLMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the course of the Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020-2022, monitoring of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in wastewater has rapidly evolved into a supplementary surveillance instrument for public health. Short term trends (2 weeks) are used as a basis for policy and decision making on measures for dealing with the pandemic. Normalisation is required to account for the dilution rate of the domestic wastewater that can strongly vary due to time- and location-dependent sewer inflow of runoff, industrial discharges and extraneous waters. The standard approach in sewage surveillance is normalisation using flow measurements, although flow based normalisation is not effective in case the wastewater volume sampled does not match the wastewater volume produced. In this paper, two alternative normalisation methods, using electrical conductivity and crAssphage have been studied and compared with the standard approach using flow measurements. For this, a total of 1116 24-h flow-proportional samples have been collected between September 2020 and August 2021 at nine monitoring locations. In addition, 221 stool samples have been analysed to determine the daily crAssphage load per person. Results show that, although crAssphage shedding rates per person vary greatly, on a population-level crAssphage loads per person per day were constant over time and similar for all catchments. Consequently, crAssphage can be used as a quantitative biomarker for populations above 5595 persons. Electrical conductivity is particularly suitable to determine dilution rates relative to dry weather flow concentrations. The overall conclusion is that flow normalisation is necessary to reliably determine short-term trends in virus circulation, and can be enhanced using crAssphage and/or electrical conductivity measurement as a quality check.

Indexed as

COVID-19WastewaterEnvironmental MonitoringFecesHumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2SewageWater MicrobiologyWater PollutionRNA, ViralSewageWastewaterCOVID-19NormalisationPublic healthSewage surveillance

Identifiers

PMID36581271
PMCPMC9791714
OpenAlexW4312220521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.