Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36580935›Full record

Trial reportRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2022

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Quadratus Lumborum Block and Intrathecal Morphine for Postcesarean Analgesia.

Karoline Moura de Araújo, Leonardo Henrique Cunha Ferraro, Sue Yasaki Sun, Rosiane Mattar

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karoline Moura de AraújoEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7655-7433
Leonardo Henrique Cunha FerraroEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5389-8796
Sue Yasaki SunEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6573-7386
Rosiane MattarEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1405-5371
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy of quadratus lumborum (QL) block and intrathecal morphine (M) for postcesarean delivery analgesia.

methodsThirty-one pregnant women with ≥ 37 weeks of gestation submitted to elective cesarean section were included in the study. They were randomly allocated to either the QL group (12.5 mg 0.5% bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia and 0.3 ml/kg 0.2% bupivacaine for QL block) or the M group (12.5 mg bupivacaine 0.5% and 100 mcg of morphine in spinal anesthesia). The visual analog scale of pain, consumption of morphine and tramadol for pain relief in 48 hours, and side effects were recorded.

resultsMedian pain score and/or pain variation were higher in the morphine group than in the QL group (

conclusionQuadratus lumborum block and intrathecal morphine are effective for analgesia after cesarean section. Patients undergoing QL block had lower postoperative pain scores without the undesirable side effects of opioids such as nausea, vomiting, and pruritus.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaTramadolAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineCesarean SectionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMorphineNauseaPostoperative PainPregnancyPruritusVomitingAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineMorphineTramadol

Identifiers

PMID36580935
PMCPMC9800151
OpenAlexW4313333016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.