Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36580593›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Evolvability and trait function predict phenotypic divergence of plant populations.

Øystein H Opedal, W Scott Armbruster, Thomas F Hansen, Agnes Holstad, Christophe Pélabon, Stefan Andersson, Diane R Campbell, Christina M Caruso, Lynda F Delph, Christopher G Eckert and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Persistent selection on size explains micro- and macroevolutionary alignments in fly wings.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Øystein H OpedalDepartment of Biology, Biodiversity Unit, Lund University, Lund 223 62, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7841-6933
W Scott ArmbrusterSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK.
Thomas F HansenDepartment of Biology, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, University of Oslo, Oslo 0316, Norway.
Agnes HolstadDepartment of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3154-1857
Christophe PélabonDepartment of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8630-8983
Stefan AnderssonDepartment of Biology, Biodiversity Unit, Lund University, Lund 223 62, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3828-5016
Diane R CampbellDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-846X
Christina M CarusoDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7069-9572
Lynda F DelphDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.ORCID 0000-0003-3257-2698
Christopher G EckertDepartment of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Åsa LankinenDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 234 22 Lomma, Sweden.
Greg M WalterSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0883-3440
Jon ÅgrenDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 753 26 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9573-2463
Geir H BolstadNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim 7485, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1356-8239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the causes and limits of population divergence in phenotypic traits is a fundamental aim of evolutionary biology, with the potential to yield predictions of adaptation to environmental change. Reciprocal transplant experiments and the evaluation of optimality models suggest that local adaptation is common but not universal, and some studies suggest that trait divergence is highly constrained by genetic variances and covariances of complex phenotypes. We analyze a large database of population divergence in plants and evaluate whether evolutionary divergence scales positively with standing genetic variation within populations (evolvability), as expected if genetic constraints are evolutionarily important. We further evaluate differences in divergence and evolvability-divergence relationships between reproductive and vegetative traits and between selfing, mixed-mating, and outcrossing species, as these factors are expected to influence both patterns of selection and evolutionary potentials. Evolutionary divergence scaled positively with evolvability. Furthermore, trait divergence was greater for vegetative traits than for floral (reproductive) traits, but largely independent of the mating system. Jointly, these factors explained ~40% of the variance in evolutionary divergence. The consistency of the evolvability-divergence relationships across diverse species suggests substantial predictability of trait divergence. The results are also consistent with genetic constraints playing a role in evolutionary divergence.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionAcclimatizationFlowersGenetic VariationPhenotypePlantsReproductionadaptationevolvabilitygenetic constraintsmacroevolution

Identifiers

PMID36580593
PMCPMC9910613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.