Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36580451›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Use of volatile anesthetics for sedation in the ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national survey in France (VOL'ICU 2 study).

Raiko Blondonnet, Aissatou Balde, Ruoyang Zhai, Bruno Pereira, Emmanuel Futier, Jean-Etienne Bazin, Thomas Godet, Jean-Michel Constantin, Céline Lambert, Matthieu Jabaudon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Raiko BlondonnetDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9881-8422
Aissatou BaldeDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9647-9498
Ruoyang ZhaiiGReD, CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraBiostatistics Unit, DRCI, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3778-7161
Emmanuel FutierDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jean-Etienne BazinDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Thomas GodetDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jean-Michel ConstantinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Céline LambertBiostatistics Unit, DRCI, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Matthieu JabaudonDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8121-1680
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has increased the number of patients in ICUs leading to a worldwide shortage of the intravenous sedative agents obligating physicians to find alternatives including inhaled sedation. Inhaled sedation in French ICU has been previously explored in 2019 (VOL'ICU study). This survey was designed to explore the use of inhaled sedation two years after our first survey and to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the use of inhaled sedation.

methodsWe designed a national survey, contacting medical directors of French ICUs between June and October 2021. Over a 50-item questionnaire, the survey covered the characteristics of the ICU, data on inhaled sedation, and practical aspects of inhaled ICU sedation for both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. Answers were compared with the previous survey, VOL'ICU.

resultsAmong the 405 ICUs contacted, 25% of the questionnaires were recorded. Most ICU directors (87%) knew about the use of inhaled ICU sedation and 63% of them have an inhaled sedation's device in their unit. The COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of inhaled sedation in French ICUs. The main reasons said by the respondent were "need for additional sedative" (62%), "shortage of intravenous sedatives" (38%) and "involved in a clinical trial" (30%). The main reasons for not using inhaled ICU sedation were "device not available" (76%), "lack of familiarity" (60%) and "no training for the teams" (58%). More than 70% of respondents were overall satisfied with the use of inhaled sedation. Almost 80% of respondents stated that inhaled sedation was a seducing alternative to intravenous sedation for management of COVID-19 patients.

conclusionThe use of inhaled sedation in ICU has increased fastly in the last 2 years, and is frequently associated with a good satisfaction among the users. Even if the COVID-19 pandemic could have impacted the widespread use of inhaled sedation, it represents an alternative to intravenous sedation for more and more physicians.

Indexed as

COVID-19Anesthetics, IntravenousHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsAnesthetics, IntravenousHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID36580451
PMCPMC9799316
OpenAlexW4313288841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.