Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36580428›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Realistic simulation in nursing education: Testing two scenario-based models.

Teresa Martins, Francisco Santos, Maria José Lumini, Maria Rui Sousa, Maria José Peixoto, Rosa Maria Freire, Berta Salazar, Carla Fernandes, Maria de Fátima Araújo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Teresa MartinsEscola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3395-7653
Francisco SantosDepartamento de Engenharia Informática, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Maria José LuminiEscola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal.
Maria Rui SousaEscola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal.
Maria José PeixotoEscola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal.
Rosa Maria FreireEscola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal.
Berta SalazarEscola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal.
Carla FernandesEscola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal.
Maria de Fátima AraújoEscola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate students' self-perceived pedagogical outcomes when using a digital scenario-based tool compared to traditional scenarios printed on paper.

designThis study used a within-subjects experiment.

methodA digital platform for scenario development was developed, focusing on patients' regaining independence and returning home after an acute event. Students participated in two simulation activities, differing only in the type of scenario used and completed a questionnaire to evaluate their learning experience.

resultsStudents considered that the new scenario template provided a clearer understanding of the situation under analysis, allowing them to recognize the focuses of attention to be prioritized when formulating the intervention plan. No Patient or Public Contribution: A digital platform for a standardized process of scenario writing to help realistic simulation in nursing education is a novelty in this study and will likely contribute to substantial learning gains.

Indexed as

Education, NursingSimulation TrainingStudents, NursingHumansLearningPatient Simulationclinical educationsimulationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID36580428
PMCPMC10077379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.