SynthesisPediatric surgery international2022
Preexisting neural factors that contribute to dysmotility in esophageal atresia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis and Management of Long-term Gastrointestinal Complications in Pediatric Esophageal Atresia/Tracheoesophageal Fistula.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Esophageal dysmotility in esophageal atresia (EA) relates to abnormal development of esophageal innervation and musculature and to the esophageal repair. Few studies have investigated the preexisting dysmotility in EA, present prior to surgery. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature on neuronal studies in EA, to understand the causative factors for esophageal dysmotility. We performed a systematic review (PubMed, EMBASE, EBM, CINAHL databases; January 1947-February 2021) in accordance with PRISMA (PROSPERO number CRD42020171014). Fourteen studies were identified (eleven human, 187 EA patients; three animal, 64 EA rat specimens). Neural factors affecting esophageal dysmotility in human and animal studies included proteins, enzymes, growth factors, and genes, which play a role in the nervous system or neuroendocrine system, some of which have functions as neuromodulators or neurotransmitters. This systematic review has identified neural factors that affect esophageal dysmotility and contributes toward our understanding of the underlying dysmotility in patients with EA. The studies identified are important and essential for successful translation of basic science knowledge to impact clinical practice and understanding. Level of evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.