Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36580140›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2022

Machine Learning in Hypertension Detection: A Study on World Hypertension Day Data.

Sara Montagna, Martino Francesco Pengo, Stefano Ferretti, Claudio Borghi, Claudio Ferri, Guido Grassi, Maria Lorenza Muiesan, Gianfranco Parati

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sara Montagna *DiSPeA-University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Piazza della Repubblica 13, Urbino, 61029, Italy. sara.montagna@uniurb.it.
Martino Francesco Pengo *Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Stefano FerrettiDiSPeA-University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Piazza della Repubblica 13, Urbino, 61029, Italy.
Claudio BorghiUniversity of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Claudio FerriMESVA-University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Guido GrassiSMS-University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Maria Lorenza MuiesanDSCS-University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Gianfranco ParatiIstituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITUniversity of Urbino · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

University of Urbino through the competitive call "Health and Food Safety Promotion BIT4Food: Blockchain and Internet of Things for Food Safety
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors have been associated with hypertension. However, current screening programs are still failing in identifying individuals at higher risk of hypertension. Given the major impact of high blood pressure on cardiovascular events and mortality, there is an urgent need to find new strategies to improve hypertension detection. We aimed to explore whether a machine learning (ML) algorithm can help identifying individuals predictors of hypertension. We analysed the data set generated by the questionnaires administered during the World Hypertension Day from 2015 to 2019. A total of 20206 individuals have been included for analysis. We tested five ML algorithms, exploiting different balancing techniques. Moreover, we computed the performance of the medical protocol currently adopted in the screening programs. Results show that a gain of sensitivity reflects in a loss of specificity, bringing to a scenario where there is not an algorithm and a configuration which properly outperforms against the others. However, Random Forest provides interesting performances (0.818 sensitivity - 0.629 specificity) compared with medical protocols (0.906 sensitivity - 0.230 specificity). Detection of hypertension at a population level still remains challenging and a machine learning approach could help in making screening programs more precise and cost effective, when based on accurate data collection. More studies are needed to identify new features to be acquired and to further improve the performances of ML models.

Indexed as

HypertensionAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningRandom ForestRisk FactorsData analysisHypertensionPrevention

Identifiers

PMID36580140
PMCPMC9800348
OpenAlexW4313290111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.