Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36580136›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2023

International Consensus Classification of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms: myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Umberto Gianelli, Jürgen Thiele, Attilio Orazi, Naseema Gangat, Alessandro M Vannucchi, Ayalew Tefferi, Hans Michael Kvasnicka

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The molecular management of classic myeloproliferative neoplasm.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Heterogeneity of platelets and their responses.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Umberto GianelliUniversity of Milan, Department of Health Sciences and S.C. Anatomia Patologica, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Jürgen ThieleInstitute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Attilio OraziDepartment of Pathology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Naseema GangatMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alessandro M VannucchiCRIMM-Centro Ricerca e Innovazione delle Malattie Mieloproliferative, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Careggi, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Ayalew TefferiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hans Michael KvasnickaUniversity Clinic Wuppertal, University of Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany. hm.kvasnicka@patho-uwh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-4840
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USAOL (United States) · USAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITTexas Tech University · USUniversity of Cologne · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recently published International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms summarized the results of an in-depth effort by pathologists, oncologists, and geneticists aimed to update the 2017 World Health Organization classification system for hematopoietic tumors. Along these lines, several important modifications were implemented in the classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). For chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR::ABL1-positive, the definition of accelerated and blast phase was simplified, and in the BCR::ABL1-negative MPNs, the classification was slightly updated to improve diagnostic specificity with a more detailed and better validated morphologic approach and the recommendation of more sensitive molecular techniques to capture in particular early stage diseases. In this regard, high sensitive single target (RT-qPCR, ddPCR) or multi-target next-generation sequencing assays with a minimal sensitivity of VAF 1% are now important for a proper diagnostic identification of MPN cases with low allelic frequencies at initial presentation. This review discusses the updated diagnostic criteria of MPN according to the ICC, particularly by highlighting the new concepts and how they can be applied in clinical settings to obtain an appropriate prognostic relevant diagnosis.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsLymphomaMyeloproliferative DisordersHumansInternational Consensus ClassificationMyeloid and lymphoid neoplasms: Myeloproliferative neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36580136
PMCPMC9852206
OpenAlexW4313279012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.