SynthesisJournal of medical systems2022
A Process Related View on the Usage of Electronic Health Records from the Patients' Perspective: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Trust and the Role of the Opt-Out Mechanism in Willingness to Share Health Data via Electronic Health Records in Germany: Telephone Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- A holistic view of facilitators and barriers of electronic health records usage from different perspectives: A qualitative content analysis approach.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2024Article
- How do opt-in versus opt-out settings nudge patients toward electronic health record adoption? An exploratory study of facilitators and barriers in Austria and France.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Dicing with data: the risks, benefits, tensions and tech of health data in the iToBoS project.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, there has been an increasing interest in electronic health record (EHR) systems and various approaches of encouraging acceptance. Multiple methods of EHR acceptance have been proposed. However, a systematic review of patient's perspectives of their role and challenges in processing EHR remains lacking. Moreover, so far, there has been little discussion about barriers and facilitators of EHR system acceptance and usage from the patients' perspective.
methodsThe study was reported according to the PRISMA statement. Six databases were systematically searched using keywords for articles from 2002-2020. We reviewed these data and used an inductive approach to analyse findings.
resultsA total of 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. Our systematic literature review results reveal a wide range of barriers and facilitators assigned to four distinct stages of EHR system usage: awareness, adoption, behaviour and perception, and consequences. Results were described in a narrative synthesis of the included empirical studies. DISCUSSION: Results underline the necessity to put a particular emphasis - but not exclusively - on the initial stage of awareness in the future. Further research in the field is therefore strongly recommended in order to develop tailored mediated communication to foster EHR system usage in the long run.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.