Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36580109›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2023

Acute physiological responses to steady-state arm cycling ergometry with and without blood flow restriction.

Mikaela L Frechette, Brendan R Scott, Ann-Maree Vallence, Summer B Cook

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mikaela L FrechetteDepartment of Kinesiology, University of New Hampshire, 124 Main Street, New Hampshire Hall, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.
Brendan R ScottCentre for Healthy Ageing, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Ann-Maree VallenceDiscipline of Psychology, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Summer B CookDepartment of Kinesiology, University of New Hampshire, 124 Main Street, New Hampshire Hall, Durham, NH, 03824, USA. summer.cook@unh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4339-716X
Murdoch University · AUUniversity of New Hampshire · US

Funding

Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award DE190100694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (VO

methodsTwelve healthy males (age: 23.9 ± 3.75 years) completed four, randomized, 15-min arm cycling conditions: high-workload (HW: 60% maximal power output), low-workload (LW: 30% maximal power output), low-workload with BFR (LW-BFR), and BFR with no exercise (BFR-only). In the BFR conditions, cuff pressure to the proximal biceps brachii was set to 70% of occlusion pressure. HR, VO

resultsHW elicited the greatest responses in HR (91% of peak; 163.3 ± 15.8 bpm), VO

conclusionsHW arm cycling elicited the largest and most persistent physiological responses compared to LW arm cycling with and without a BFR. As such, practitioners who prescribe arm cycling for their clients should be advised to augment the demands of exercise via increases in exercise intensity (i.e., power output), rather than by adding BFR.

Indexed as

ArmHemodynamicsAdultErgometryExerciseHeart RateHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionRegional Blood FlowYoung AdultAerobic exerciseBFRBlood lactateHeart rateOxygen consumptionRating of perceived exertion

Identifiers

PMID36580109
OpenAlexW4313280739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.