Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36580031›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2023

A survey on preoperative autologous blood donation policy in bone marrow stem cell donors in Italy.

Claudia Del Fante, Francesca Masiello, Stefania Vaglio, Letizia Lombardini, Serelina Coluzzi, Maria B Rondinelli, Fabio Ciceri, Simonetta Pupella, Vincenzo De Angelis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia Del FanteImmunohematology and Transfusion Service, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Francesca MasielloItalian National Blood Center, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Stefania VaglioItalian National Blood Center, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Letizia LombardiniItalian National Transplant Center, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Serelina ColuzziImmunohaematology and Transfusion Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Maria B RondinelliTransfusion Medicine, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Fabio CiceriDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Simonetta PupellaItalian National Blood Center, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo De AngelisItalian National Blood Center, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high safety of homologous blood components, together with the introduction of the Patient Blood Management strategy, has led to the progressive abandonment of preoperative autologous blood donation (PAD) in surgery. Furthermore, recent scientific publications provide evidence about the non-usefulness of PAD in the collection of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from bone marrow (BM), also in consideration of harvest procedure safety. Nevertheless, no conclusive studies have been published yet. MATERIALS AND

methodsBlood Establishments (BE) and Bone Marrow Collection Centers (BMCC) participated in a specific qualitative survey proposed by Italian National Blood and Transplant centers with the support of the relevant Italian Scientific Societies. The survey aimed at evaluating the policy adopted for PAD in related and unrelated adult HSC donors in Italy during the period 2018-2020.

resultsForty-one BE corresponding to 37 BMCC filled in the questionnaire. Of 830 BM donors, 661 (80%) underwent 1063 PAD (mean 1.6 PAD/donor). The remaining 169 donors (20%) underwent BM harvest without PAD. No serious adverse events were reported for either donor group. In the case of ineligibility of donors for the PAD program, due to low hemoglobin values, 7/10 centers shifted donors to peripheral blood stem cell collection and three centers chose a different donor. Remarkably, only 51% of the PAD units requested were eventually transfused during the BM harvest process. Finally, the iron support policy among centers was heterogeneous. DISCUSSION: The results of this survey show that PAD is heterogeneously applied in Italian BMCC, as in other countries. However, all BMCC except two are willing to adopt a Patient Blood Management strategy as an alternative approach to adult related and unrelated BM donor harvests.

Indexed as

Blood DonationBone Marrow TransplantationAdultBlood DonorsHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansItalyTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID36580031
PMCPMC10335345
OpenAlexW4313280154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.